VO2 Max
What counts as a good VO2 max for your age, how much to trust your watch's estimate, and why it matters.
VO2 max is the closest thing a wearable gives you to a single fitness number, and it's one of the more researched metrics for long-term health. Your watch only estimates it, with varying accuracy. Here's what's normal for your age, how the estimate is made, and what the research connects it to.
| Device | What they call it | What it actually measures |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Watch | "Cardio Fitness" (a branded name, not the scientific term) | Estimated from walking/running heart rate data, per Apple's own published technical paper. Classified into four tiers (Low/Below Average/Above Average/High), not a raw number by default. |
| Garmin | "VO2 Max" (keeps the scientific term directly) | Firstbeat Analytics algorithm, analyzing the heart rate-to-pace relationship during outdoor runs/walks. |
| Fitbit | "Cardio Fitness Score" | Tracks the relationship between running pace and heart rate during a run, compares that against resting heart rate, then benchmarks the result against age, sex, and weight norms. |
| RingConn | "VO2 Max" | Added via a 2025 app update, estimated from heart-rate response during a run or walk plus age, weight, and gender. |
| Ultrahuman Ring | "VO2 Max" | Calculated from age, gender, mobility level, max heart rate, resting heart rate, and body weight, an inputs-and-formula approach rather than a dedicated test. |
| Coros | "Fitness Level" | Estimated via Coros's own EvoLab engine rather than the licensed Firstbeat algorithm Garmin uses. Methodology is unpublished; no independent validation was found. |
| Polar Vantage | "Polar Fitness Test" | Estimated at rest from heart rate, no exercise required. A 2025 study against CPET found 13.7% mean absolute error, but accuracy varies sharply by population: 23.8% overestimate in a healthy group, 102.4% in a Fontan-circulation group. |
Apple deliberately renamed this to "Cardio Fitness" rather than using the technical term, and Fitbit uses the near-identical branded name "Cardio Fitness Score" for its own separate estimate, a genuine naming coincidence between two unrelated brands rather than a shared methodology. "Cardio Fitness" on an iPhone/Watch, "Cardio Fitness Score" on a Fitbit, and "VO2 Max" on a Garmin are all the same underlying concept, so someone comparing devices might not realize all three are estimating the same thing. Oura and Whoop don't offer a standalone VO2 max estimate of any kind.
Device measurement accuracy: Emerging · see the fileSources: Apple's own technical PDF, "Using Apple Watch to Estimate Cardio Fitness with VO2 max" (apple.com), a genuine primary source. Garmin's Firstbeat detail from Garmin's own technology page (garmin.com). Fitbit/Google's own support documentation (official); Freeberg KA et al., "Assessing the ability of the Fitbit Charge 2 to accurately predict VO2max," mHealth, 2019, doi:10.21037/mhealth.2019.09.07.
Where your number sits by age, and how far to trust your watch's estimate.
See how you compare