Sleep
What your sleep score is built from, why it moves, and what the stages and totals actually mean.
Sleep scores feel precise, but they're built from estimates, and they don't always match how rested you feel. A good night can score badly and a short night can score well. Here's what the research says these numbers are really tracking, what moves them, and how much weight to put on the score versus the trend.
| Device | What they call it | What it actually measures |
|---|---|---|
| Oura | "Sleep Score" | 7 inputs: total sleep time, efficiency, restfulness, REM duration, deep sleep duration, latency, timing consistency. |
| Whoop | "Sleep Performance" | 4 inputs: sleep sufficiency (hours vs. needed), sleep consistency (vs. prior 4 nights), sleep efficiency, sleep stress. |
| Garmin | "Sleep Score" | Incorporates a separate stress metric derived from HRV, alongside sleep stages. |
| Fitbit | "Sleep Score" | Combines heart rate, total time asleep, and sleep-stage breakdown into one 0-100 number, grouped into four bands from Poor to Excellent. Available on the free tier. |
| Apple Watch | "Sleep Stages" and, since watchOS 26, "Sleep Score" | Since watchOS 9, estimates Awake/REM/Core/Deep stages from motion, heart-rate dynamics, and circadian timing. watchOS 26 added a 0-100 Sleep Score weighted across sleep duration (50 points), bedtime consistency (30 points), and interruptions (20 points). |
| RingConn | Sleep stages, breathing rate, skin temperature | A real published validation exists: a joint RingConn/Shanghai Ruijin Hospital dataset compared the ring against polysomnography, the clinical gold standard. |
| Samsung Galaxy Watch | "Sleep Score" and "Sleep Coaching" | Sleep Score runs 1-100 from four inputs; Sleep Coaching layers HRV, SpO2, and respiratory rate over 4-5 weeks into a personalized plan. |
| Ultrahuman Ring | "Sleep Algorithm 2.0" | Machine-learning model trained on 125,000+ nights. Ultrahuman's own 6-participant pilot study reported 2.4-2.6% mean absolute error against an FDA-approved reference device, but it's self-published, not independently peer-reviewed. |
| Coros | "Sleep Score" and "Sleep Stress" | Stages graded against National Sleep Foundation thresholds; Sleep Stress separately flags physical/mental strain from elevated heart rate and lowered overnight HRV. |
| Amazfit | No standalone Sleep Score | Sleep tracking feeds directly into the next morning's Readiness Score rather than standing alone as its own branded score. |
| Polar Vantage | "Sleep Plus" | Tracks stages, continuity, and quality, feeding results into Recovery Pro alongside HRV and training data. |
Oura, Whoop, Garmin, Fitbit, and, since watchOS 26, Apple all call it a "Sleep Score" or close to it, but the actual formulas weigh meaningfully different things. Oura leans on stage architecture, Whoop on performance and consistency framing, Garmin folds in a stress signal the others do not, Fitbit runs the simplest formula of the group, and Apple is the only one that publishes its exact weighting. A Sleep Score from one device is not measuring the same combination of things as another, even at the same numeric value.
Device measurement accuracy: Uncertain · on the Research DeskSources: Oura's own support docs (support.ouraring.com) and Whoop's own published sleep-accuracy page (whoop.com), both primary. Fitbit/Google's own support documentation (official). Apple's own support documentation (official). Garmin's stress-in-sleep-score detail came from a secondary comparison source.
What goes into the number and what it can and can't tell you.
See how you compare