What Is a Good Resting Heart Rate for a 60 or 70 Year Old?

US national reference values for resting heart rate in this age band, why they barely change with age, how wearable resting heart rate differs from a clinic count, and what a higher number is associated with.

For a man aged 60 to 79, the median resting pulse in US national survey data is 67 beats per minute, with half of men between 60 and 75. For a woman the median is 70, with half between 64 and 78. That is almost identical to the range for people in their 40s and 50s, because resting heart rate barely changes with age in adults. What the evidence adds after 60 is about meaning. In 653 adults aged 55 to 75 with no apparent heart disease, night-time heart rate was the only heart rate measure that still predicted cardiovascular events after adjusting for other risk factors, and night-time is when rings such as Oura take their reading. In 5,042 adults with an average age of 75, the highest third of resting heart rate went with a higher risk of losing independence in everyday self-care.

Resting heart rate percentiles for ages 60 to 79

From the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which covers 60 to 79 as one group.

The same range as at 40

Across the survey's adult age groups, mean resting pulse for men was 71, 71, 70 and 71 beats per minute from 20 to 39 through 80 and over, and for women 76, 73, 73 and 73 (National Health Statistics Reports, CDC, 2011). The table above sits within a beat or two of the 40 to 59 table at every percentile. A 68-year-old reading 66 is in the same place in the range as a 48-year-old reading 66.

What does change with age is how steady the number is. In 92,457 adults wearing a wrist tracker, people over 60 showed the lowest day-to-day variation in resting heart rate of any age group (PLOS One, 2020). A sustained change from a stable baseline is therefore easier to see at this age, which is the case early illness detection and resting heart rate trends cover.

Night-time heart rate carried the most information

In the Copenhagen Holter Study, 653 men and women aged 55 to 75 with no apparent heart disease wore a 48-hour ECG and were followed for a median of 76 months. Resting heart rate after 10 minutes of rest, 24-hour heart rate and night-time heart rate between 2:00 and 2:15 a.m. were all associated with all-cause mortality. But once conventional cardiovascular risk factors were accounted for, only night-time heart rate still predicted cardiovascular events, with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (European Heart Journal, 2013).

That matters for anyone over 55 with a ring or watch, because an overnight figure is exactly what Oura reports, as both an average and a lowest value from readings every 10 minutes (Oura support),. It is one study of 653 people, so it supports paying attention to the overnight number rather than proving it is the better marker. Resting heart rate high at night covers what pushes it up.

Resting heart rate and staying independent

In 5,042 older adults from the PROSPER trial, average age 75.3, followed for 3.2 years, those in the highest third of resting heart rate (71 to 117 beats per minute) had a 1.79-fold higher risk of decline in basic activities of daily living and a 1.35-fold higher risk of decline in instrumental activities such as shopping and managing money, independent of cardiovascular disease, medications and other risk factors (Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2015).

Across 46 studies and 1,246,203 people, each 10 beats per minute went with a relative risk of 1.09 for all-cause mortality, and a resting rate over 80 against the lowest group with 1.45 (Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2016). Our resting heart rate desk rates the general link with cardiovascular health and mortality as Emerging and the link with heart failure as Established. All of these are associations; they do not show how much changing one person's number changes their risk. See resting heart rate and longevity.

Medication changes the comparison

The national reference excluded anyone with a condition or medication affecting their pulse, including heart-rate-lowering drugs such as beta blockers. If you take one, the table describes a different group from you, and a low number may reflect the drug rather than fitness. GLP-1 drugs push the other way, raising resting heart rate, which GLP-1 drugs and resting heart rate covers. Wearable accuracy for resting heart rate is reasonable against an overnight ECG, between 1.67 and 3.00 percent mean absolute error for the Oura, Polar and Whoop devices tested (Physiological Reports, 2025), though our desk rates accuracy across consumer devices as Uncertain.

Common questions